As someone who has followed the NBA for over two decades, I’ve always been fascinated not just by the on-court brilliance but also by the intricate systems that recognize greatness—especially the MVP award. Let’s pull back the curtain on how the NBA MVP voting process really works, because it’s far more nuanced than just picking the league’s top scorer or the flashiest player. I remember watching Derrick Rose’s MVP season back in 2011 and thinking, "How did the voters settle on him?" That curiosity led me down a rabbit hole of research, interviews, and even conversations with a few media members who’ve cast votes themselves. So here’s the lowdown, straight from my years of observation and digging.
First off, the voting panel consists of around 100 sportswriters and broadcasters from the U.S. and Canada, each selected for their expertise and professional standing. They don’t just wing it—there’s a structured ballot where they rank their top five choices, with points assigned as follows: 10 points for first place, seven for second, five for third, three for fourth, and one for fifth. I’ve always liked this ranked-choice system because it encourages voters to think beyond their favorite candidate and consider a broader field. For instance, in the 2022-2023 season, Joel Embiid narrowly edged out Nikola Jokić with 73 first-place votes to Jokić’s 65, but it was the distribution of second and third-place votes that ultimately sealed the deal. That’s where the drama unfolds, folks—it’s not just about who’s number one on the list, but how the rest of the ballot shakes out.
Now, you might wonder what criteria voters use. From what I’ve gathered, it’s a mix of individual stats, team success, and narrative. Stats like Player Efficiency Rating (PER), Win Shares, and plus-minus metrics often come into play, but they’re not the whole story. Take last year’s race: Jokić posted a historic PER of around 32.8, but Embiid’s 33.1 points per game and the 76ers’ 54-win season gave him the edge in the "value" department. Personally, I lean toward valuing team success a bit more—after all, the term "Most Valuable" implies lifting your squad to new heights. But I’ve seen debates where voters prioritize carrying a mediocre roster, which explains why Westbrook won in 2017 despite the Thunder only notching 47 wins. It’s this subjectivity that keeps things interesting, and honestly, it’s why I enjoy the annual arguments among fans.
Let’s talk about the timeline and context. Voting happens right after the regular season wraps up but before the playoffs begin—a crucial detail, because postseason performance shouldn’t influence the award. I can’t stress this enough: forgetting this rule leads to recency bias, like when Steve Nash snagged his second MVP in 2006 partly due to the Suns’ explosive style, even though some stats favored other candidates. In my experience covering the league, I’ve noticed that late-season surges or high-profile matchups can sway voters, especially if a player leads a dramatic turnaround. For example, if a team starts 8-0 like UST did last year in a different league, but then slips to three losses in eight games, voters might still reward a star who keeps them competitive—similar to how Stephen Curry’s 2016 unanimous MVP came from Golden State’s historic 73-9 run, despite a couple of late stumbles.
But here’s where it gets messy: the human element. Voters have their biases, whether it’s favoring underdogs, prioritizing narrative arcs, or overemphasizing clutch moments. I’ll admit, I’m a sucker for a good comeback story myself—like when Giannis Antetokounmpo won in 2019 after improving his team’s win total by 16 games from the previous year. However, this can lead to inconsistencies. In the 2021 race, Jokić’s advanced stats were off the charts, but some voters held his team’s third-seed finish against him, while others championed his ironman 72-game season. It’s these gray areas that make the process feel less like a science and more like an art, and from my perspective, that’s not necessarily a bad thing. It reflects the dynamic nature of basketball, where numbers don’t always capture leadership or intangible impact.
Wrapping up, the NBA MVP voting is a blend of data-driven analysis and storytelling, shaped by a diverse group of experts. Over the years, I’ve come to appreciate it as a reflection of the season’s broader themes—whether it’s dominance, resilience, or innovation. While no system is perfect, this one generally crowns deserving legends, even if we occasionally debate snubs for years. As the league evolves, with new stats and global media expanding the voter pool, I’m excited to see how the criteria adapt. For now, though, next time you’re arguing with friends over who should win, remember it’s not just about stats—it’s about how a player defines the season, much like how a trusted leader can inspire a team through ups and downs, turning doubt into belief.
Nba Live Today©