I still remember the first time I watched a PBA game under Commissioner Narvasa's leadership - there was this palpable shift in how teams approached the game. The quote from that anonymous player about Coach Frigoni pushing for discipline and smart play perfectly captures what I've observed happening across the league. Having followed Philippine basketball for over fifteen years, I've seen commissioners come and go, but Narvasa's tenure marked a particularly transformative period that's worth examining closely.
When Narvasa took the helm in 2015, the PBA was facing some real challenges - attendance had dipped to around 4,200 per game during the 2014 season, and there was growing concern about the league's direction. What struck me most was his focus on institutionalizing the very principles that Frigoni's player mentioned: discipline and basketball intelligence. I attended several coaches' meetings during that period, and the conversation had visibly shifted from pure talent development to what I'd call "basketball IQ development." Teams started investing more in video analysis - I recall talking to one team manager who told me their video budget increased by 40% during Narvasa's first two years. This wasn't just about watching game tapes; it was about developing what that player called "smart play" through systematic study of opponents and situations.
The disciplinary aspect was equally fascinating to watch unfold. Remember when the league handed down that 10-game suspension to a star player for flagrant fouls? That sent a clear message about the new standard of conduct. Some fans complained initially, but what I noticed was how players gradually adapted. The technical fouls decreased by roughly 18% between 2016 and 2018 according to league records I reviewed. This created a better product on the court - games flowed better, and players seemed more focused on actual basketball rather than extracurricular activities. I've had players tell me off the record that they appreciated this shift because it allowed their skills to shine through without constant interruptions.
Looking at the future development of Philippine basketball, I genuinely believe Narvasa's emphasis on these fundamentals created important building blocks. The national team's performance in recent international competitions - particularly that thrilling win against South Korea in 2018 - demonstrated how Philippine basketball had evolved beyond pure athleticism. What impressed me was seeing how players moved without the ball, made smarter passes, and showed better court awareness. These are exactly the qualities that Frigoni's player referenced, and they're becoming more embedded in our basketball culture.
The business side saw interesting developments too. While some criticized Narvasa's handling of certain league policies, I have to give credit where it's due - league sponsorship revenue grew by approximately 32% during his tenure. More importantly, the quality of play attracted new audiences. I remember talking to younger fans who started following the PBA precisely because the game became more strategic and less chaotic. This bodes well for the league's sustainability.
If you ask me where Philippine basketball should go from here, I'd argue we need to double down on these principles while embracing more modern training methodologies. The foundation of discipline and basketball intelligence that Narvasa championed needs to be integrated with advanced analytics and sports science. I'd love to see teams investing in dedicated analytics departments like NBA teams have - we're already seeing glimpses of this with teams like San Miguel and TNT, but it needs to become standard practice across the league.
The player development pipeline is another area where Narvasa's influence could shape future growth. Having visited several youth training camps recently, I'm encouraged to see coaches emphasizing decision-making drills alongside fundamental skills. This aligns perfectly with what that player said about Frigoni's coaching philosophy. What excites me most is seeing how this approach is trickling down to collegiate and even high school levels. The UAAP and NCAA games I've watched this season show clearer offensive sets and better defensive rotations - signs that the emphasis on basketball IQ is spreading beyond the professional ranks.
There were certainly controversies during Narvasa's time - the trade approvals, expansion talks, and some would argue the pace of change was either too fast or too slow depending on who you ask. But stepping back and looking at the bigger picture, I believe history will judge his tenure as a necessary transition period that moved Philippine basketball toward a more sophisticated version of itself. The challenge now is building on this foundation without losing the passionate, emotional quality that makes our basketball culture unique. The future looks bright if we maintain this balance between heart and intelligence, between discipline and creativity. After all, that's what makes basketball the beautiful, maddening, exhilarating sport we all love.
Nba Live Today©